Unfortunately, we are still many years away from decriminalization of these drugs. Do we have a moral obligation to keep these drugs illegal? Or should we take a rational approach and end prohibition? While it's true, that many of these narcotics are extremely harmful, wouldn't it be a better idea if the Government had oversight? They could control the way the market (s) operates and in doing so it could also collect more tax dollars. The problems that we face domestically are nothing compared to the destruction it is wreaking in South America. Rio de Janeiro alone has at least 100,000 people working in the drug trade.
The answer to this old question of legalization or prohibition certainly isn't an easy one. Yes, drugs are harmful, but we must weigh the pros and cons. Regardless of our decision, there will be drugs and they will be used; so why not have them regulated by the Government. It will be interesting to see how this all unfolds during the Olympics of 2016.
--P
I do not know what happened to this post. But I do not see it on the blog. One thing I would like to add is that the drug trade and our anti drug efforts are responsible for funding and creating sympathy for the Taliban.
--TWM
No comments:
Post a Comment